This Saturday Buckley vs Malott · Rogers Place Edmonton AB Canada See this week's picks →
Events · Nurmagomedov vs Song ·

Cam Nelson vs Ding Meng

Red corner CamNelson
VSSettled
Blue corner DingMeng
Welterweight3 rounds29 Aug 2026
8-1
Record
35-11
−3 yr28
Age
31
5' 11"
Height
+3″6' 2"
72″
Reach
+1″73″
Orthodox
Stance
Orthodox
Vitals, record, nickname and camp come from the public UFC fighter register and are current, not a snapshot of fight night. UFC bouts, finish rate and every storyline line are counted off the official UFC fight record. A tick marks the side holding the raw edge in that row — longer reach, taller, younger, more bouts, a higher finish rate. It is a fact about the tape, not a prediction, and rows with no clean comparison (record, stance, gym, hometown) carry no tick at all. Any row we cannot fill on both sides is left out rather than half-drawn. Where a fighter was born and where they fight out of come from their Wikipedia entry; where we hold neither, the hometown shown is Sherdog’s. Streaks, bout counts and finish rates are as they stood going into this fight — this bout and everything after it is excluded from the count.

The call vs the fight

What we published before the card, next to what happened in the cage.

Our call
Cam Nelson
67.5% confidentLOW
Method calledKO/TKO 42%
Vs the market−19.9pp
Market had our pick at87%
The fight
Cam Nelson
WIN✗
How it endedU-DEC
Round3 of 3
Clock5:00
Called it We called Cam Nelson at 67.5% and Cam Nelson won. The method call missed.
Graded against the official UFC result, from the same record every other page on this site is graded from. The tick beside the verdict is the method call — a correct winner with a wrong method is a partial hit and reads as one. See the full public record →

Round by round

Every round the fight went, shaded by where the significant strikes actually landed — the takedowns, control time and knockdowns beside them, and how the three judges scored that round.

UFCStats · per round

3 rounds of tape

Round 15:00 of action
Cam Nelson18 sig landed
HEAD72%13 of 20BODY0%0 landedLEGS28%5 of 6
Ding Meng13 sig landed
HEAD23%3 of 14BODY23%3 of 7LEGS54%7 of 9
18 of 26
Sig.
strikes
13 of 30
1 of 1
Take-
downs
0 of 0
1:54
Control
0:00
Distance 6Clinch 0Ground 12
Where it
happened
Distance 13Clinch 0Ground 0
Judges · this round · Nelson firstPaul Barton10–9Ben Cartlidge10–9Clemens Werner10–9
Round 25:00 of action
Cam Nelson20 sig landed
HEAD80%16 of 32BODY5%1 of 2LEGS15%3 of 5
Ding Meng12 sig landed
HEAD33%4 of 16BODY17%2 of 4LEGS50%6 of 7
20 of 39
Sig.
strikes
12 of 27
2 of 2
Take-
downs
0 of 0
2:42
Control
0:00
Distance 7Clinch 0Ground 13
Where it
happened
Distance 12Clinch 0Ground 0
Judges · this round · Nelson firstPaul Barton10–9Ben Cartlidge10–9Clemens Werner10–9
Round 35:00 of actionEnded 5:00
Cam Nelson3 sig landed
HEAD100%3 of 5BODY0%0 landedLEGS0%0 landed
Ding Meng14 sig landed
HEAD36%5 of 11BODY57%8 of 10LEGS7%1 of 1
3 of 5
Sig.
strikes
14 of 22
1 of 8
Take-
downs
0 of 1
1:58
Control
1:10
Distance 2Clinch 1Ground 0
Where it
happened
Distance 9Clinch 5Ground 0
Judges · this round · Nelson firstPaul Barton9–10Ben Cartlidge9–10Clemens Werner9–10

Significant strikes, takedowns, control time, knockdowns and submission attempts exactly as UFCStats recorded them for this bout, round by round. Zone percentages are that round’s landed head, body and leg counts over their own total — raw arithmetic, nothing modelled or smoothed. A round in which a fighter landed nothing shades empty and reads zero; it is never filled in from the round before.

The cards, totalled

The judges’ final totals, the media’s cards beside them, and how these judges usually score. Their round-by-round 10–9s are with the rounds above.

Official card

Unanimous Decision

Referee · Matt Wynne
Cam NelsonDing Meng
Official totals — Cam Nelson first
JudgeTotal
Paul Barton29–28
Ben Cartlidge2.1 avg spread · 45% wide29–28
Clemens Werner2.1 avg spread · 50% wide29–28

Each judge’s round-by-round scores sit with the round they belong to, in the round-by-round section above — switch a round there and the three cards for it change with the stats.

Media cards — 3 scored, Cam Nelson first · unofficial

Danny Segura MMAJunkie.com29–28
Sherdog.com29–28
Ryan Frederick WrestlingObserver.com29–28

Fan vote · unofficial

29-28 Nelson · 54%29-28 Ding · 32%30-27 Ding · 9%30-27 Nelson · 4%

22 fan cards submitted to MMA Decisions.

Official cards come from the UFCStats fight record and MMA Decisions. Media cards and the fan vote are MMA Decisions’ own collection and are not official. Judge tendency figures are that judge’s whole recorded history, not this bout — they are context for how a card was scored, never a claim that it was scored wrongly.

Takedowns

Takedowns

The level change — head to head

Career UFC takedown rates. Red corner left, blue corner right.

Cam Nelson

4.00takedowns / 15 min
4.00 / 15m
TAKEDOWNS
0.33 / 15m
11.11 / 15m
ATTEMPTS
1.00 / 15m
36%
ACCURACY
33%
0.00 / 15m
SUB ATT
0.00 / 15m

Ding Meng

0.33takedowns / 15 min

Career UFC takedown rates exactly as UFCStats publishes them: takedowns landed per 15 minutes, completion rate, submission attempts per 15 minutes, and the share of takedowns tried on them that they stuffed. Attempts per 15 is the one derived figure — landed ÷ completion rate — and it is omitted wherever either input is missing. UFCStats writes 0% where no attempt was recorded at all, so a percentage of exactly zero reads “n/a” here rather than as a measured rate. “Field” is the average fighter in that weight class, or across every division where a class is too small to average. Rate bars run to the population’s 95th percentile (5.27 takedowns / 15m); a fighter above it pins the bar. Percentages are drawn on their own axis.

Ranked in Welterweight

The market story

What the market did on the way to the cage — the price, not our model. The gold marker is where our pick was frozen.

Cam NelsonDing MengPolymarketSportsbook consensus (vig removed)
Cam Nelson vs Ding Meng — implied win chance over timeLine chart. Market-implied win chance for Cam Nelson and Ding Meng from Aug 22 to Aug 29, drawn from Polymarket and the sportsbook consensus. Cam Nelson moves from 50% to 44% and Ding Meng from 50% to 56%. A gold marker shows where our pick was frozen.35%40%45%50%55%60%65%Aug 22Aug 24Aug 26Aug 27Aug 29▲ our call: Cam Nelson (LOW)44%56%

From the open the market drifted away from our pick: Cam Nelson's implied chance moved down from 50% to 44% (−5.5pp).

This series stops at Aug 29 07:12Z — the point at which this bout’s own market began the move that ended in settlement. Our capture window is card-level and kept running through the fight, so what follows it in the raw file is the market collapsing live and then paying out at 1.00 / 0.00. That is a settlement, not price history: it is not drawn, and it is not counted in the figures below.

Our published call had Cam Nelson at 67.5%. At the last price we captured before this bout’s market began to settle, the de-vigged market had the same fighter at 44.5% — our number sat 23.0pp above the market’s. Two numbers, side by side. How our calls have actually done is the public record, not one bout.

Show the numbers
SeriesOpenLowHighLast pre-fightMove
Cam Nelson — sportsbook consensus50.7%40.3%50.7%43.4%−7.3pp
Ding Meng — sportsbook consensus49.3%49.3%59.7%56.6%+7.3pp
Cam Nelson — Polymarket50.0%40.5%50.0%44.5%−5.5pp
Ding Meng — Polymarket50.0%50.0%59.5%55.5%+5.5pp
Price history from Polymarket (moneyline, both corners) and BestFightOdds (sportsbook consensus, vig removed). 1,846 snapshots on file · window Aug 22 22:06–Aug 29 07:09Z · last capture Aug 29, 07:09Z · hourly-downsampled for the chart · read at build time from the price archive, not a live feed.
← Back to the public record